![]() ![]() Previous correspondence suggests that the Church of England, backed by the Queen, refused DNA testing on the grounds that it could set a precedent for testing historical theories that would lead to multiple royal disinterments. However, any forensic testing would also require consent from the Dean of Westminster. ![]() “He is rumoured to have said he would like an investigation to go ahead, so that we can determine, once and for all, how the young royals died,” she told the Sandon Literature Festival in Staffordshire. The King, she claimed, is said to take “a very different view” on the subject to his mother, who considered it more appropriate to leave the Princes’ memory to rest in peace. The late monarch was said to oppose any form of investigation that might reveal how Edward V and his younger brother, Richard, Duke of York, had died.īut Tracy Borman, joint chief curator of Historic Royal Palaces, has suggested that the King may have a different attitude, raising the prospect that it might yet be established how the boys met their deaths in the Tower of London in the 15th-century. Who those adults were we will probably never know.Academics and historians have long conceded that the mystery surrounding the disappearance of the young Princes in the Tower would never be solved during Queen Elizabeth II’s reign. "They became inconvenient pawns in a political game, and they were betrayed by adults they trusted. Science may finally provide a way to identify the bones, but amid all the theorising, we shouldn’t forget that these were young children, trapped and terrified. ![]() Historic Royal Palaces said: "Someone, long dead themselves, knew what happened to the little princes. His skeleton was found under a car park in Leicester in 2012. Richard died two years later in the Battle of Bosworth Field, part of the Wars of the Roses. Read more: RAF Cadets warned Remembrance Sunday parade could break the law as police scrap 'gesture of goodwill' He is portrayed as a murderer with a limp and a withered arm in the play, although there is no evidence he had these disabilities. Their uncle Richard III was demonised over a century later by Shakespeare in his play of the same name, largely shaping the public opinion of the monarch in the centuries to come. There is no definitive evidence that they were murdered, and a more recent scheme called the Missing Princes Project has pieced together various clues that suggests they may not have been killed at all - but instead removed to a village in Devon called Coldridge. "Already there is a suspicion that they have been done away with."Ībout 200 years later, bones of two young children were discovered when part of the Tower was demolished.Ī test in 1933 found that they were aged ten and 12, although more modern forensic tests may come up with more detailed results, archaeologists now think. What happened to them is not known, but an Italian diplomat wrote soon afterwards: "Withdrawn to the inner apartments of the Tower proper, and day by day began to be seen more rarely behind the bars and windows until at length they ceased to appear altogether. Read more: 'Absolutely no plans to change anything', insists minister, as Kwarteng flies home early from Washington Richard III then had himself crowned king, and the boys were reportedly removed to the inner chambers of the Tower. King’s coronation set for May 6 with Camilla to be crowned alongside Charles ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |